Maya Training

Introduction to Hard Surface Modeling

Maya Training

Interiors and Furniture Vol 1 & 2 - Modeling & Cloth

Maya Training

Shading, Lighting and Rendering the Bedroom in MR

Maya Training

Robot volume one - Modeling with animation in mind

Maya Training

Spach-Alspaugh House the complete courseware

Maya Training

Burt The Cartoon Dinosaur Vol 01 - Modeling

New Maya Training

Robot Volume 02 - Hybrid Rigging
You are here > Home > SimplyMaya Community Forums
Loading

Welcome to Simply Maya

Please Sign in or Sign up for an account

Member Login

Lost your password?

Not a member yet? Sign Up!

Old 15-03-2006, 02:01 PM   #1
farbtopf
Subscriber
 
farbtopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London
Posts: 520
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default 5+ and 3 sided polys

Hi,

just a simple question out of curiosity. Why avoid 5 and 3 sided polys while modeling? The 5+ ones I can see the reason, but wht#s wrong with 3 sided ones. As you will heve to use them ocasionally. Does it have to do with texturing? Or maybe animating your model. Even though you can triangulate and its fine to animate afterwards.

farbtopf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-03-2006, 02:06 PM   #2
vladimirjp
Subscriber
 
vladimirjp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: stuck in the 90's boston, USA
Posts: 1,871
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: 5+ and 3 sided polys

Originally posted by farbtopf
Hi,

just a simple question out of curiosity. Why avoid 5 and 3 sided polys while modeling? The 5+ ones I can see the reason, but wht#s wrong with 3 sided ones. As you will heve to use them ocasionally. Does it have to do with texturing? Or maybe animating your model. Even though you can triangulate and its fine to animate afterwards.

theres no real reason to avoid them really. they work fine for me in most cases.


only reason for maya is when u convert a poly with a non-quad face into a subD it wouldnt render in MR [until maya 5 i think] now u can just use the subD aprrox tool and it renders quad non-quads no problem.
__________________
Image dump
vladimirjp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-03-2006, 02:30 PM   #3
farbtopf
Subscriber
 
farbtopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London
Posts: 520
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Ok,

why should I then spend hours adding lines to my model, complicating geometry just to get rid of two tri's.

doesn't make sense.
farbtopf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-03-2006, 02:37 PM   #4
j5ive
Subscriber
 
j5ive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sunny Ol' Wigan, UK
Posts: 752
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Default

From what I've read you should maintain as proper topology as possible, using 4 almost square sides, as it can seriously affect the way light is reflected and simply makes it easier to texture/alter geometry etc. It also can cause major probs with animation if your geometry is not 4 sided and smooth flowing.
__________________
If you believe in telekinesis, raise my right hand.
j5ive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-03-2006, 02:42 PM   #5
vladimirjp
Subscriber
 
vladimirjp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: stuck in the 90's boston, USA
Posts: 1,871
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Originally posted by j5ive
From what I've read you should maintain as proper topology as possible, using 4 almost square sides, as it can seriously affect the way light is reflected and simply makes it easier to texture/alter geometry etc. It also can cause major probs with animation if your geometry is not 4 sided and smooth flowing.
u have proof or examples of such cases?
__________________
Image dump
vladimirjp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-03-2006, 02:47 PM   #6
j5ive
Subscriber
 
j5ive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sunny Ol' Wigan, UK
Posts: 752
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Examples of where I read it yes, Books 'Creating the Art of the Game' by Andrew Ward I think and Game Character Development.
__________________
If you believe in telekinesis, raise my right hand.
j5ive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-03-2006, 04:23 PM   #7
lisa_gonzalez
Subscriber
 
lisa_gonzalez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London, England
Posts: 301
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Default

I've looked at a lot of meshes that have been made at my work, and 3-sided tris aren't totally avoided, especially when you are modelling highly realistic stuff that needs bevelled edges and the likes. However, meshes that will be subdivided and characters are always kept to quads (as much as is possible), but it doesn't matter when your making a purely polygonal model. 5 or more sides should be avoided though. Sometimes its just not feasible to create a lot more geometry just to get rid of a few tris.

__________________
When in doubt......smile!

http://www.x-menthelaststand.com/
lisa_gonzalez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-03-2006, 05:40 PM   #8
vladimirjp
Subscriber
 
vladimirjp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: stuck in the 90's boston, USA
Posts: 1,871
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default

J5ive: if i recall right, all game models are triangulated, so im not sure why a game book would be against tris..
tris work in some places, in other places they dont, same goes for n-gons
__________________
Image dump
vladimirjp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-03-2006, 07:46 PM   #9
farbtopf
Subscriber
 
farbtopf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London
Posts: 520
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

so I don't nmeed to spend hours thinking how to split my polys just to wipe out tris:attn: Sounds good to me. I was just wondering because in all the vid tutorials I've seen so far the instructors emphazise a lot on tidying up until all the tris are gone.
From what you guys said it sounds a bit like an oldschool habbit to be on the safe side.
farbtopf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-03-2006, 09:27 AM   #10
j5ive
Subscriber
 
j5ive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sunny Ol' Wigan, UK
Posts: 752
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Vlad: Game models are normally made as quads then converted either manually or automated into tris, or they can be made from scratch straight as tris, but it isn't really good work flow having lots of both. I am stating what I read from books I am currently reading, other than me scan the pages I suggest you get them yourself and have a read through.

Though, like you said using tris to add geometry at times is the most effective way. I suppose it depends what this guys model is for as to whether he could get away with slack edge loops and stable polys.

__________________
If you believe in telekinesis, raise my right hand.
j5ive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-03-2006, 11:25 PM   #11
Coldfire
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Is just using triangulate or quadrangulate good enough? Or is it better to manually change them?
Coldfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-03-2006, 12:53 AM   #12
gster123
Moderator
 
gster123's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Manchester Uk
Posts: 6,300
Thanks: 1
Thanked 51 Times in 45 Posts
Default

From all the books i've read they ALWAYS go on the quad route,

However they do then go on to say you "Should try to keep into quads for ease of animation and conversion into other programs"
gster123 is offline   Reply With Quote

A little bit about who we are
Links you might find useful
Catch up with SimplyMaya
SimplyMaya specialises in Maya tutorials. We offer over 1,000 individual Maya training videos, ranging from basic Maya tutorials through to intermediate Maya tutorials. Our tutorials are created by instructors with industry experience and are designed to get you up and running in Maya quickly without making it seem like hard work.

Copyright © 1999-2015 SimplyMaya - vBulletin® Copyright © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.