SimplyMaya Forums

Welcome to the forum, feel free to ask questions here.

Home / forum / Lounges / Technical Issues / expert help here!
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

New Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 24-05-2003, 07:22 PM   #1
tuddel
Registered User
 
tuddel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ph
Posts: 36
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default expert help here!

hi! i just benchmark my maya 4.5 (linux and windows)

for windows (win2k sp3 detonator 40.72)

for linux (rh 7.3 maya4_5-4.5-90 xfree 4.2.0 (come with redhat 7.3) nvidia glx 4363) (kernel i686 bigmem)

hardware pentium 3 933 1280M(pc-133) quadro2 mxr tuv4x (bios pnp off) (4x agp all optimization in bios) (both os in 1 harddisk sperate partition, NTFS and ext3fs) no swapfiles.

well i used the rendertest.ma (found at highend3d) to benchmark my system, i made a couple of benchmark in command line and batch renders(gui) it seems that win2k is faster than a linux system with a default kernel mem, then i tried to recompile my kernel (cause i couldn't believe) but still no lack win2k is still faster (about 10 - 30) sec (command , gui respectedly)

anyone can give some nice suggestion about this?
tuddel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-05-2003, 11:11 AM   #2
BabyDuck
Subscriber
 
BabyDuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 1,170
Thanks: 3
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Default

what about if maya is just better optimized for windows than it is for linux. if i were a|w i would optimize the software that most of the users use - not sure if there is more windows than linux users - just an assumption on my side.
BabyDuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-05-2003, 12:36 PM   #3
badbunny
Subscriber
 
badbunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lincoln, UK
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

what was the total rendertime on the system - I mean is 10-30 secs a very small percentage ?

Also, are the times in Win2k and Linux repeatable ?

I don't know if its using the hard disk much but the hard disk is not a uniform speed across the platter (I know you said swaps were off) - is your Linux partition in the slower area? Although to be honest I wouldn't have though this would have made a massive difference unless its thrashing the hard disk around a lot though - on some computations at work we can get hours of difference on a twenty hour moderately hard disk intensive analysis depending on how full the hard disk is and where its writing to.

Clutching at straws really....
badbunny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2003, 09:14 PM   #4
tuddel
Registered User
 
tuddel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ph
Posts: 36
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

cli win2k fastest 3:01 mins, 3:05 (repeated many times)
gui win2k 3:06 - 3:11 (repeated many times)

cli no x linux 3:13 - 3:17 (repeated many times)
x kde - 3:21 - 3:40 (repeated many times)

i'm planning for a rebenchmarking again, i have already formatted my drives, and some little tweaking, and im all set, and maybe i'll post the render logs here, hope i really made a mistakes, cause i know linux must be better againt windows when it comes to rendering, cause linux can be optimized and scalable,(renderfarms) , and i have read some articles in the net that claiming maya linux is better than win(sort of like that) " Thanks in part to Maya, Linux is becoming the technical desktop of choice for the film industry. "

http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=5235

but i can't really make a conclusion, haven't tried it on a different hardware, but for now i'll just rebenchmark again my newly format setup system system, and i'm hoping that this time linux will win,

and guys, any good maya tweaks or system tweaks that i can add, before i make the test, (will render tom. evening.) thankx

Last edited by tuddel : 26-05-2003 at 09:19 PM.
tuddel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2003, 09:29 PM   #5
badbunny
Subscriber
 
badbunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lincoln, UK
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Linux is better than Windows at some things, but in terms of how quick a program can do something, as long as the software isn't really badly written for one operating system, it shouldn't really be that different with the same hardware, coming down to just processing power.

We use finite element engineering simulation software at work (lots of cpu, LOTS of memory, lots of hard disk thrashing) and I've been doing lots of benchmarking between Linux and Win2k versions of software on the same hardware. To be honest I've found little difference between run times on the two, with some cases the Win2k being quicker. The only thing is, the Linux machine is still capable of doing other things and is fairly responsive, whereas the Win2k machine is completely unusable while its doing the computation.

Last edited by badbunny : 26-05-2003 at 09:32 PM.
badbunny is offline   Reply With Quote
New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

1 Month

$34

Month-to-month billing
$34/month
Unlimited access to all videos
Project files to download
Easy to cancel at anytime
 
 

3 months

$87

Billing every 3 months
$29/month
Unlimited access to all videos
Project files to download
Easy to cancel at anytime
Save $5 per month or $15 in total compared to monthly billing with this package.

12 months

$288

Billing every 12 months
$24/month
Unlimited access to all videos
Project files to download
Easy to cancel at anytime
Save $10 per month or $120 in total compared to monthly billing with this package.

Your plan will automatically renew. You can cancel at any time via your PayPal account to avoid being charged again.

You can view the FAQ on our video plans here. You can contact us directly here. By clicking one of the buttons above, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.