Bugatti Veyron - Page 2 - Simply Maya User Community

# 16 12-04-2011 , 11:25 AM

Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011

Posts: 126

Did I mention you are bloody quick! not bad for some one who hasnt ridden a bike for a while! LOL

Originally Posted by bullet1968

To be fair I did start in in January. lol

Lots of trial and error but now I'm on the second project it seems to be going so much quicker.

Got arequest for a character model so Im going to try out the Chef Ramsay tutorial first rather than jump in blind.

Quote

# 17 12-04-2011 , 11:34 AM

Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011

Posts: 126

Congrat! Thats very clean. How many poly did you end up with ?

Originally Posted by Joey81

Hi Joey,

Around 4 million smoothed.

320,000 unsmoothed.

Quote

# 18 04-12-2012 , 11:51 PM

Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2004

Location: Michigan, USA

Posts: 2,998

Very nice work CS.

I was happy to see the use of nurbs curves to layout the main body lines. Very nice conversion to clean poly topology.

Also, very nice unification of some of the complex compound shapes like the valve cover piece.

GG!

-rick

"If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants." Sir Isaac Newton, 1675

Quote

# 19 05-12-2012 , 05:09 AM

Acid44

Guest

Posts: n/a

The edges around the panel gaps look a bit messy, or at least they're making the normals look a bit messy.

Other than that, looks great man. Are you gonna give it an interior?

Quote

# 20 22-12-2012 , 02:17 PM

Lead Modeler - Framestore
Join Date: Feb 2003

Location: UK

Posts: 6,287

The edges around the panel gaps look a bit messy, or at least they're making the normals look a bit messy

Originally Posted by

forgive my ignorance...Im kind of new here to modelling....but am I missing something?

Only mods can delete CJ.

J

Quote

# 21 22-12-2012 , 03:41 PM

Acid44

Guest

Posts: n/a

I mean the shadowing around some of the panel gaps, circled in red in the attachment.

Attached Thumbnails

Click image for larger version

Name: progress_129.jpeg
Views: 308
Size: 86.2 KB
ID: 53076

Quote

# 22 22-12-2012 , 04:08 PM

Lead Modeler - Framestore
Join Date: Feb 2003

Location: UK

Posts: 6,287

I wouldnt actually say it was messy though....perhaps a terminating loop around the end to balance the thickness all the way thru wouldnt hurt, but its hardly an eyesore....

Ive seen stuff from high end studios that would make you toes curl, this is a joy compared to those models

J

Quote

# 23 22-12-2012 , 05:49 PM

The thin red line
Join Date: Aug 2009

Location: England

Posts: 4,472

I would be quite happy if that was my mesh and that was all you could find fault with it.........LOL.........dave

Avatar Challenge Winner 2010

Quote

# 24 22-12-2012 , 07:41 PM

Acid44

Guest

Posts: n/a

It's probably not something a normal person would bother with or even notice, but all I model is cars, so things like that stand out like a sore thumb to me user added image

Quote

# 25 22-12-2012 , 08:48 PM

Lead Modeler - Framestore
Join Date: Feb 2003

Location: UK

Posts: 6,287

Its interesting...I've learned so much over the years on modelling pretty much anything, and I can tell you that any imperfections in a model these days are a joy to see and do add to the realism and dont make then so CG. I know in this case its a happy accident.... Im not talking about missing loops but general imperfections between joins etc or asymmetry on a character model. Thats attention to detail.

My p51 Mustang model is undergoing the surface imperfection modelling at the moment, to give the surface that slightly man made look. Its the same with cars, the panelling wont be exact, personally I think it worth doing....dare to go that step further...be different, be better!

Jay

Quote

# 26 23-12-2012 , 07:45 AM

Technical Director
Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 2,988

I'm with Jay. Don't think people will notice the asymmetry? Take a 3d scan and mirror it, there's your proof.

Imagination is more important than knowledge.

Quote

# 27 23-12-2012 , 01:06 PM

Acid44

Guest

Posts: n/a

I agree to an extent. With a normal car, go for it, but with a car on this level, one that costs something like 6 million GBP to manufacture, I don't think they'd allow any asymmetry at all in the factory.

Quote

# 28 23-12-2012 , 02:10 PM

Lead Modeler - Framestore
Join Date: Feb 2003

Location: UK

Posts: 6,287

Err they are built by hand so I can bet they arent perfect at all and the 16.4 EB version is only 1.7million bucks if you have it laying around spare....

J

Quote