MARTIX RELOADED - FULL DISCUSSION - Page 8 - Simply Maya User Community

Introduction to Maya - Modeling Fundamentals Vol 1

This course will look at the fundamentals of modeling in Maya with an emphasis on creating good topology. We'll look at what makes a good model in Maya and why objects are modeled in the way they are.

Watch

# 106 04-06-2003 , 04:23 PM

Registered User
Join Date: May 2003

Location: Shanghai/Pittsburgh

Posts: 263

I'd be pissed if we had to wait 4 years for the next one user added image

Quote

# 107 04-06-2003 , 04:29 PM

Kevin

Guest

Posts: n/a

might give em time to come up with something that didnt suck so much!

Quote

# 108 21-06-2003 , 04:12 AM

Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002

Location: CCS, Venezuela

Posts: 3,363

LOl
THE MATRIX RELOADED: THE ABRIDGED SCRIPT™

adldesigner
Caracas, Venezuela
Hell .. not gone perse, but with a certainly lower post count per day.

Quote

# 109 21-06-2003 , 04:25 AM

The Maya Mountain
Join Date: Aug 2002

Location: Seattle, WA

Posts: 8,245

Don't even have to watch the movie now user added image

-Mike
The Maya Toolbelt

Quote

# 110 21-06-2003 , 08:42 AM

Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002

Location: Minnesota, USA

Posts: 3,709

LOL! That was great!!!

Israel "Izzy" Long
Motion and Title Design for Broadcast-Film-DS
izzylong.com

Quote

# 111 22-06-2003 , 07:23 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: Jan 2003

Location: Zurich/London

Posts: 663

I watched it yesterday. Boy was I dissapointed. Don't get me wrong the fight scenes, Ducati bike chase, CG stuff, the 2 rastas were all great but the story SUCKED!!!!!!!
What I found really boaring was-

1-The dancing/love making scene. Did not impress me at all.
2- The architect was talking so much bullshit.
3- Ending was shit
4- Yes the fights were cool but no progression from the previous Matrix movie.
5- I t has been said millions of time CG alone cannot make a movie cool. The story has to be good.

Now for me LOTR owns Matrix. It is a perfect combination of CG and good story telling. I am just looking forward to Part-3 of LOTR and TERMINATOR 3 " Rise of the machines"

The music towards the end of the trailer is AWESOME!!!!! You now what??? I will start a new thread about T3 :-)
https://www.terminator3.com/
https://www.eterminator.com/

grrrr

Quote

# 112 23-06-2003 , 05:31 AM

Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002

Location: Switzerland

Posts: 161

thats all true... but all my friends told me how bad it was... and so i had absolutly no expectations and just enjoyed the cg user added image

i think they should have made one bigger part 2 instead of part 2 and part 3...

Quote

# 113 23-06-2003 , 06:59 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003

Location: New York, USA

Posts: 1,945

... albino rastafarians... thats just great.

________________________
AIM: SublimeDragon33
Catch me if i'm on. Always up for a chat.
e-mail: sublimedragon33@gmail.com

Quote

# 114 23-06-2003 , 07:20 PM

Registered User
Join Date: May 2003

Location: Shanghai/Pittsburgh

Posts: 263

they're british. with 2nd degree black belts

MSN: cyborg_corporation@hotmail.com
AIM: RavagingOrc
ICQ: 49041947

Quote

# 115 23-06-2003 , 08:20 PM

Subscriber
Join Date: Nov 2002

Location: USA

Posts: 1,170

Originally posted by abra
thats all true... but all my friends told me how bad it was... and so i had absolutly no expectations and just enjoyed the cg

i think they should have made one bigger part 2 instead of part 2 and part 3...

Originally Posted by

they are making part 2 bigger - movie 2 and 3 is part 2. but so they had it in movie length and could add more scenes that expand the length they just split it up user added image

now i wonder if matrix is designed as trilogy - does that mean 3 parts or 3 movies - would really be annoying to have end revolutions exactly as reloaded. and they make us then wait for the 3rd part user added image

lotr (the book) is not a trilogy - only a story split up into 6 books.

Quote

# 116 23-06-2003 , 09:30 PM

Registered User
Join Date: May 2003

Location: Shanghai/Pittsburgh

Posts: 263

wasn't it originally written as 1 big book?

MSN: cyborg_corporation@hotmail.com
AIM: RavagingOrc
ICQ: 49041947

Quote

# 117 23-06-2003 , 09:43 PM

Subscriber
Join Date: Nov 2002

Location: USA

Posts: 1,170

it was published in one volume. book 1 and 2 belong to fellowship of the ring, book 3 and 4 to two towers and back 5 and 6 belong to return of the king. they also published it (dont ask me what was first) as a 3 volume set. and as the story has 3 parts, people were just confused and called it trilogy, as it had 3 "books" (volumes of the 3 volume version).

Quote

# 118 24-06-2003 , 02:12 AM

Registered User
Join Date: May 2003

Location: Shanghai/Pittsburgh

Posts: 263

I find it more convient to be published as a trilogy. would have been a hassle as 6 books

MSN: cyborg_corporation@hotmail.com
AIM: RavagingOrc
ICQ: 49041947

Quote

# 119 24-06-2003 , 05:35 AM

Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 1,113

It was written as 1 book. The pulisher would not publish it as one huge book, so they forced Tolken to split it up into 3. Tolken had already split the book up into 6 volumes during the writing of the big book, so he just made each book, 2 volumes each. Then followed The Hobit, then The Silmarillion. But thats another story.

Armitrex Studios
Now open!!

Quote