Indigo Unbiased Renderer - Page 3 - Simply Maya User Community

# 31 07-05-2006 , 02:24 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005

Location: Fairfield, CT

Posts: 2,436

You can actually get Very Fast renders within indigo! Just turn the max global illumination bounces to something like 15 (its not like you NEED 1000 GI bounces), and Indigo will actually render quite fast!

This in just 8 minutes.

Attached Thumbnails

Click image for larger version

Name: lownoise.jpg
Views: 298
Size: 86.6 KB
ID: 28379

Live the life you love, love the life you live

Quote

# 32 07-05-2006 , 05:08 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005

Location: Fairfield, CT

Posts: 2,436

well- in 2 hrs 50 mins:

Attached Thumbnails

Click image for larger version

Name: nonoise.jpg
Views: 288
Size: 62.0 KB
ID: 28380

Live the life you love, love the life you live

Quote

# 33 07-05-2006 , 05:13 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005

Location: Boston, MA

Posts: 2,314

very nice:attn: :attn: :attn: :attn:

Environment Artist @ Plastic Piranha
www.joopson.com

Quote

# 34 07-05-2006 , 06:55 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005

Location: Fairfield, CT

Posts: 2,436

thanks joop user added image

Live the life you love, love the life you live

Quote

# 35 07-05-2006 , 07:40 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005

Location: Boston, MA

Posts: 2,314

sounds like me and you are the only ones who like this renderer much user added image

Environment Artist @ Plastic Piranha
www.joopson.com

Quote

# 36 07-05-2006 , 07:58 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006

Posts: 189

This is a nice Render for being free! user added image

I wouldn't try to use this for movies or anything,
but for just some illustrations and images it's fine... user added image

I like Mental Ray and Maxwell better anyway though... :p

Quote

# 37 07-05-2006 , 08:08 PM

Moderator
Join Date: May 2005

Location: Manchester Uk

Posts: 6,300

I like the way you set up the lighting in Maxwell (looking at Joopsons Pics) as i've done a bit on light specs so that makes sense to me.

I think that the rendering times compared to the image quality of Indigo is pretty poor (compared to MR, Renderman etc) , BUT it does look like it's able to produce good results if you've got the time, and the big bonus is that its free.

As your doing a raytracing program Matt, its worth you looking into everything and having the knowlage of the interface, method's, quality etc under your belt as it will only make your's better in the long run.

Quote

# 38 07-05-2006 , 08:30 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006

Posts: 189

I did a fast test with Mental Ray to show it's power! :p hehe
Just 3 mins of rendering! user added image

Attached Images

Quote

# 39 07-05-2006 , 08:35 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005

Location: Fairfield, CT

Posts: 2,436

Arne- that Cornell Box has nowhere near the GI quality of the one rendered in Indigo. However- I am aware that Mental Ray is awesome- the pic from my avatar was rendered in just 3 hours. Indigo would take years :p

Joop-

Originally posted by Joopson
sounds like me and you are the only ones who like this renderer much

Originally Posted by

Yeah, that's cuz we can leave this or Maxwell (or u can leav Maxwell) on during school, but still user added image

is right.

well on my raytracer, I am having problems with certain BRDF models (to be exact, all of them) so I can't add global illumination!

I decided (again) not do do photon mapping but to go back to my path tracing idea, and to take a look at the MLT algorithm, might speed things up a bit.

But I really want to make it work with Maya... first of all, or at least work with any model that comes in (obj & .3ds). But if I learned anything from this it is that I really need to write a .XML parser for my model loading, and shaders, materials, etc.

Oh well, I have a while ahead of me, it's not like I have to finish this project tomorrow or the day after( or the month after, or the year after for that matter).

Later,
Matt user added image

Live the life you love, love the life you live

Last edited by MattTheMan; 07-05-2006 at 08:48 PM.

Quote

# 40 07-05-2006 , 08:52 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006

Posts: 189

I didn't use GI... user added image

But I know it could be much better than this!
I only used 20 mins on the "modelling", setting and rendring...

Quote

# 41 07-05-2006 , 09:06 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005

Location: Fairfield, CT

Posts: 2,436

hmmm... interesting? did you use some reflectivity or something? final gather maybe? secondary lights?

please tell me, I am curious on how you did it.

Live the life you love, love the life you live

Quote

# 42 08-05-2006 , 03:21 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006

Posts: 189

It is four diffrent Lamberts, one light with shadow...
And with Mental Ray Production Quality and Final Gather turned on user added image

New one:

Attached Images

Last edited by arneoog; 08-05-2006 at 03:23 PM.

Quote

# 43 08-05-2006 , 03:32 PM

Subscriber
Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 1,043

3 min to render ? what are your specs to pc and how did you render so quick ?

Quote

# 44 08-05-2006 , 03:46 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006

Posts: 189

Hehe, I thought it was slow... :p

Graphic Card: Nvidia Gforce 7800 GS with 256 MB
Processor: AMD Athlon 64 3000+
RAM: 512 MB

I just try to avoid using slow-to-render attributes user added image

Quote

# 45 08-05-2006 , 08:28 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005

Location: Fairfield, CT

Posts: 2,436

hmm- yeah, final gather is considered Global Illumination thogh. Still- looks k00l! I am cooking an Indigo render now, but I plan on leaving it on for about 4 more hours (its at 8 hrs 30 mins now).

Live the life you love, love the life you live

Quote

Posting Rules Forum Rules

Similar Threads

Topics

Free Courses

Full Courses

VFX News