SimplyMaya Forums

Welcome to the forum, feel free to ask questions here.


SM Forums / Lounges / Maya Basics & Newbie Lounge / 3D vs 3D

Maya Basics & Newbie Lounge Please post in this section ONLY if your question doesn't fit in anywhere else on the forum, or if you're not sure which section it's relevant to. We also have Free streaming trial available.

Join the conversation. Reply to post
 
Thread Tools
16-04-2010, 05:23 PM   #1
stwert
EduSciVis-er
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,374
3D vs 3D
So... with all this 3D craze, does anyone else get really confused and not just a little annoyed with the term "3D".

I mean, when "3D" movies starting coming out in waves, I remember hearing that "UP would be Pixar's first 3D movie" and I was like... uhh... what? Ohh, like put on glasses 3D. And today I was hearing about Autodesk Homestyler which claims to "View floor plans and interior designs in 2D and 3D." So... is this 3D? Or just 3D...

The difference between 2D graphics and 3D graphics is quite obvious, in that you are dealing with creating elements in more than 2 axes/dimensions. But with today's post-processing, 2D images can be viewed in "3D", like Alice.

And 2.5D is a whole other thing... technically Disney and others were doing what is termed "2.5D" in the 40's (I think), but now it's a big deal or something? And many times 3D viewing is a stereo picture of 2.5D (i.e. layered) images. Not to mention (though I will) when 3D graphics are toon-rendered for a 2D look. I wonder what happens when those get processed to "3D".

So why can't we have a word that means what we all do here (I propose 3D graphics), and another word for glasses (or glassesless) stereo images (I propose stereo - it worked for music)

All that to say that this dimensionality is a convoluted and ambiguous set of media buzz-words for a big cash-grab. Let's be clear on exactly what we are referring to.

[/rant]

EDIT: Darn, with a bit more patience I could have had a 666 rant post
  Reply with quote
16-04-2010, 09:58 PM   #2
Jay
Lead Modeler - Framestore
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 6,276
The term 'In 3d' is what everyone knows ( the general public) as wearing the glasses. So its not really anything to worry about.

But we as 3d geeky techy dudes know it Stereoscopic 3d for when its viewed with glasses.

However I dont recall any pixar movie or alike advertising their movies in the past as being '3d'. They were classed as a CG movie as they were just using 3d as another medium to create the film nothing more. Its only now since the technology has been improved with Avatar being clearly the front runner that alot of films are now in viewable 'in 3d' by this I mean the movie 'Up' too.

watching the film 'normally' is simply classed as 2d, its become the norm.

Jay
  Reply with quote
16-04-2010, 10:17 PM   #3
elephantinc
Level 32 pachyderm
 
elephantinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England
Posts: 1,859
I feel exactly the same way, it drives me mental. If someone asks what I'm doing and I say 3D, or if I'm talking about a 3D app and someone decides to butt in, they think I mean stereoscopic 3D and then when I explain to them what I meant my 3D they get annoyed/disappointed.
  Reply with quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3dprint.com and 3ders.org features D3CRYPT3D! Stolen 3D assets NO MORE d3crypt3d Maya Basics & Newbie Lounge 0 03-11-2016 09:13 PM
3D 3D 3D glasses elephantinc Finished Work 3 06-03-2011 06:10 PM
Toy Story 3 3D Review stwert Maya Basics & Newbie Lounge 1 28-06-2010 03:57 AM
Why Maya? haka Maya Basics & Newbie Lounge 21 10-11-2007 11:14 PM
3D in PS CS3, ramifications? mirek03 Maya Basics & Newbie Lounge 3 02-10-2007 05:44 PM