Maya 6 might be coming out - Page 3 - Simply Maya User Community

Integrating 3D models with photography

Interested in integrating your 3D work with the real world? This might help

Watch

# 31 26-08-2003 , 11:20 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003

Posts: 800

Woo hoo!

Quote

# 32 27-08-2003 , 08:43 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: Apr 2002

Location: The Planet Apple MacTosh

Posts: 523

Oh god... I haven't even opened the box for Photoshop 7 yet.

Gonna have to give up work and spend the time keeping up with the upgrades user added image

MY BRAIN HURTS!!!

Tickety boo and ta ta for a bit...
Gazzamataz
https://www.gazzamataz.com

Quote

# 33 02-09-2003 , 11:11 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003

Location: San Antonio, TX

Posts: 346

I think that Maya is by far the best 3d package out there... user added image

Grinning Idiot Films

Our Pal the Atom

Quote

# 34 03-09-2003 , 03:08 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: May 2003

Location: Ventura California

Posts: 966

But the most expensive company to buy from.

Quote

# 35 03-09-2003 , 03:16 AM

The Maya Mountain
Join Date: Aug 2002

Location: Seattle, WA

Posts: 8,245

Max costs more than Maya Complete.

Least it did last time I checked.

-Mike
The Maya Toolbelt

Quote

# 36 03-09-2003 , 03:21 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: May 2003

Location: Ventura California

Posts: 966

Yea Complete,, but Unlimited ?

Quote

# 37 03-09-2003 , 03:22 AM

The Maya Mountain
Join Date: Aug 2002

Location: Seattle, WA

Posts: 8,245

Unlimited isn't really worth getting in my opinion. Nothing on it that I need that Complete doesn't have or can't mimic in some form.

Complete works perfectly well.

-Mike
The Maya Toolbelt

Quote

# 38 03-09-2003 , 03:28 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: May 2003

Location: Ventura California

Posts: 966

I'm not sure so I'm asking,, dose it have fur and water wave?

Quote

# 39 03-09-2003 , 03:39 AM

The Maya Mountain
Join Date: Aug 2002

Location: Seattle, WA

Posts: 8,245

Nope.

But then, I don't need those things. user added image

-Mike
The Maya Toolbelt

Quote

# 40 10-09-2003 , 01:39 PM

Subscriber
Join Date: Jan 2003

Location: Zurich/London

Posts: 663

Guys I posted/started this topic. What I meant was Maya 5.5 and not Maya 6:-)
Lack of sleep does that sometimes (all the time)

grrrr

Quote

# 41 10-09-2003 , 04:10 PM

Subscriber
Join Date: Apr 2002

Location: The Planet Apple MacTosh

Posts: 523

Talking of Maya 5, I have just been looking at it's new features, especially the character rigging and animation ones. Well, I could fall flat on my back cos I just seen some new constraints added (Parent) and a new option for keeping the offsets.

For those of you who haven't done character animation these are a real bonus! They endear Maya 5 to me immediately. Now I can make my character walk along with his hat on, take it off and leave it on the table without having to make different versions and invisible hats user added image

Funny thing is (KEVIN - I HOPE YOU ARE READING THIS) that I have been able to do this in A:M for several years user added image

But now I can do it in Maya without the crashing...

Just a bit of excitement for us character animators!

Tickety boo and ta ta for a bit...
Gazzamataz
https://www.gazzamataz.com

Quote

# 42 11-09-2003 , 08:58 AM

user title spammer
Join Date: Jun 2003

Location: Germany

Posts: 195

i love my maya unlimited ... the Maya Live tool is GREAT , and cloth is FUN, an fur i never used user added image

but i only got a student licence of unlimited .. because it was CHEAPER than the student licence of complete (they had a few unlimited promo packs left but no complete promo packs user added image

)

Quote

# 43 02-10-2003 , 05:17 AM

Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003

Location: Barranquilla, Colombia

Posts: 4

I think that 7k for a program that does not render particles in itself but need aftereffect to post process it is a nonsense for the "Academy Award software"

Quote

# 44 02-10-2003 , 05:44 AM

Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003

Posts: 800

Yeah but its super awesome.

Quote

# 45 02-10-2003 , 09:18 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: Apr 2002

Location: The Planet Apple MacTosh

Posts: 523

I think that 7k for a program that does not render particles in itself but need aftereffect to post process it is a nonsense for the "Academy Award software"

Originally Posted by

I never understood this either. I started 3D with Cinema4D whcih had particles which didn't need compositing afterwards, then I moved onto Animation Master which didn't need it either.

Is there some advatage not being able render the particles within the render and having to compositing them outside of Maya? Well, I can imagine there is but why not give us the option if you don't want such a classy render for us more casual users like me user added image