.. in just a minute ... ok i will post the image in another minute, i have to resize 
.
Substance Painter
In this start to finish texturing project within Substance Painter we cover all the techniques you need to texture the robot character.
#
91
12-04-2003
, 09:56 PM
Subscriber
Join Date: Jan 2003
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 2,250
.. in just a minute ... ok i will post the image in another minute, i have to resize .
"I should call you sugar maple tree cause i'd totally tap that" haha
email - mattwettstein@gmail.com
#
92
12-04-2003
, 10:04 PM
Subscriber
Join Date: Jan 2003
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 2,250
. Anyways, its moreso smoothed out, tell me what you think caligraphics and what i still have to work on .. thanks. BTW, you see the ring with the 2 holes in it and that rod above it with holes in that? Well, go southeast from that ring and you will see a round cylinder.... its more detailed then it came out in the picuture after i resized it... but, thats going to be the little red button . Now that i look at it, this render isnt as nice... i did turn off "receive shadows".. that is what must of really knocked down the render time. It kinda did take away from the render though, hmmm... if anyone sees anything that still needs lots of work let me know (other than for that line thats running through the little red button... that i didnt notice until after the render... that must of happened when i smoothed at one time 
).
"I should call you sugar maple tree cause i'd totally tap that" haha
email - mattwettstein@gmail.com
Last edited by M; 12-04-2003 at 10:09 PM.
#
93
13-04-2003
, 01:53 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 1,945
________________________
AIM: SublimeDragon33
Catch me if i'm on. Always up for a chat.
e-mail: sublimedragon33@gmail.com
#
94
13-04-2003
, 01:58 AM
Simply Maya OG
Join Date: Dec 2002
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Queensbury NY, US A
Posts: 1,438
- Hybrid
#
95
13-04-2003
, 04:35 AM
Subscriber
Join Date: Apr 2003
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Framingham, MA United States
Posts: 1,112
About the backwards rocket guys, i don't think he is trying to create new futuristic rockets to try to confuse you, but rather its on the ref, and its on the model. I think i even remember noticing that in the movie and scratching my head. If you REALLY wanna know what it is...........the ask ZurG hehe
Question: I noticed that you resized that final render, and i was thinking that that would make it look better (rendering slightly larger than you're final product, not making it smaller = ) for my movie if i rendered at say 800x600 for a 720x480 DV. But i wasn't sure.
"When you are born, you have a resposiblilty to program you're own mind, if you do not accept this responsiblilty, then the world will do it for you"
Aol Instant messenger: mrcoolbp2
Last edited by Vectorman; 13-04-2003 at 04:38 AM.
#
96
13-04-2003
, 05:17 AM
Subscriber
Join Date: Jan 2003
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 2,250
, ya..cya.
"I should call you sugar maple tree cause i'd totally tap that" haha
email - mattwettstein@gmail.com
#
97
13-04-2003
, 08:28 PM
Subscriber
Join Date: Apr 2003
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Framingham, MA United States
Posts: 1,112
"When you are born, you have a resposiblilty to program you're own mind, if you do not accept this responsiblilty, then the world will do it for you"
Aol Instant messenger: mrcoolbp2
#
98
14-04-2003
, 12:39 AM
Subscriber
Join Date: Jan 2003
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 2,250
, i feel that rendering at 1024 gives you the BEST of quality imho . So 800x600 should be enough, but 1024 should give you the best.... i think .
"I should call you sugar maple tree cause i'd totally tap that" haha
email - mattwettstein@gmail.com
#
99
14-04-2003
, 01:27 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: CCS, Venezuela
Posts: 3,363
Remember though that if you´re working for a 720x480 aspect ratio, then your image even though bigger should be at least a multiple of the number.Originally posted by Vectorman
Question: I noticed that you resized that final render, and i was thinking that that would make it look better (rendering slightly larger than you're final product, not making it smaller = ) for my movie if i rendered at say 800x600 for a 720x480 DV. But i wasn't sure.
For example, if you want to render an image 800 pixels wide, to scale it down to 720 (Which will obviously make it a more rich image) your height should be 533,33 pixels long (Obviously this one doesn´t exist) .. however you might want to try 920x680.
I just added 200 pixels to the height and width, and this one WILL scale down correctly, unlike the 800X600 -since those are different aspect ratios-
Hope this helps,
<adldesigner notices his having trouble finding the right way to express himself>
adldesigner
Caracas, Venezuela
Hell .. not gone perse, but with a certainly lower post count per day.
#
100
14-04-2003
, 02:25 AM
Subscriber
Join Date: Dec 2002
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Idaho USA!!!
Posts: 492
I'll have to watch it again and look for that thing on the gun.Originally posted by M
First off, yea. about that rocket.. i was wondering the same thing LOL. It is in the refrence, vector is right. The thing is, im pretty sure its a shooting net, or its a freezing rocket thing. It doesnt shoot out of the gun, it just shoots something out of that. And vectorman, I usually think rendering large then making small is the best, but for a movie your best bet may just be to render at the same size. But then again when i render small you can get little defects in the render, when you render over 1024, usually all of these are smoothed out, then its just a matter of resizing the pixels. I am not the best person to answer this, but i think bigger to smaller (within a certain ammount.. seeing pixels can start to get off a bit, if its a BIG change) is your best bet
+ adldesigner + Just out of curiosity, how come LW didn't work out?
https://www.darrylworley.com/
https://www.defendamerica.mil/nmam.html
#
101
14-04-2003
, 02:35 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: CCS, Venezuela
Posts: 3,363
I guess I was used to Maya´s workflow, nodes and all. Besides I´ve got so much software on me -learned that is- that I started to overflow. My brain just threw me a buffer underrun.Originally posted by Hidalgo
+ adldesigner + Just out of curiosity, how come LW didn't work out?
adldesigner
Caracas, Venezuela
Hell .. not gone perse, but with a certainly lower post count per day.
#
102
15-04-2003
, 02:26 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 1,945
________________________
AIM: SublimeDragon33
Catch me if i'm on. Always up for a chat.
e-mail: sublimedragon33@gmail.com
#
103
15-04-2003
, 08:12 AM
Subscriber
Join Date: Apr 2003
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Framingham, MA United States
Posts: 1,112
"When you are born, you have a resposiblilty to program you're own mind, if you do not accept this responsiblilty, then the world will do it for you"
Aol Instant messenger: mrcoolbp2
Posting Rules Forum Rules
Similar Threads
Topics
Free Courses
Full Courses
VFX News
How computer animation was used 30 years ago to make a Roger Rabbit short
On 2022-07-18 14:30:13
Sneak peek at Houdini 19.5
On 2022-07-18 14:17:59
VFX Breakdown The Man Who Fell To Earth
On 2022-07-15 13:14:36
Resident Evil - Teaser Trailer
On 2022-05-13 13:52:25
New cloud modeling nodes for Bifrost
On 2022-05-02 20:24:13
MPC Showreel 2022
On 2022-04-13 16:02:13