Why Maya?

# 1 25-10-2002 , 07:38 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 23

I realize that this is going to get a very biased answer, but that's what I want.

I have tried to do the research to find the best program to start with and for some reason I think Maya is the way to go, but I don't know why.

So what do you guys like about Maya?
Why is Maya better than _________?
What does Maya do well?

Quote

# 2 25-10-2002 , 07:54 PM

Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2002

Location: London, UK

Posts: 3,198

Hmm...it's propably not the easiest 3d package to learn but...

It's stable
It's flexible
It's loaded with features
It has everything you need...

I'm a previous 3dsmax user (used it for many years) and so far I don't have anything negative to say about Maya. The renderer has propably been the weakest chain in Maya but that is about to be change since they're integrating Mental Ray in it fot free!

Kari
- My Website
- My IMDB

Do a lot, Fail a lot and Learn a lot!

Quote

# 3 25-10-2002 , 07:54 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002

Location: CCS, Venezuela

Posts: 3,363

I don´t know, it has a certain "it" that I find appealing. (Must be the cigar hottie user added image

).

Great answer huh?

<adldesigner takes off his clothes and runs>

adldesigner
Caracas, Venezuela
Hell .. not gone perse, but with a certainly lower post count per day.

Quote

# 4 25-10-2002 , 08:02 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 23

kbrown had a good point - Everything I read said that Maya 3D Render is a POS and that to get decent results you had to use it in connection with Renderman (which has a huge price tag).

So, with this new Mental Ray, will that replace the need for Renderman completely?

Quote

# 5 25-10-2002 , 08:10 PM

Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2002

Location: London, UK

Posts: 3,198

I can't comment about that since I don't have any experience on either of them. I only know that I've seen some pretty darn nice images rendered with both of them user added image

Kari
- My Website
- My IMDB

Do a lot, Fail a lot and Learn a lot!

Quote

# 6 25-10-2002 , 08:12 PM

Kevin

Guest

Posts: n/a

try 3d max for a week, you will soon see why!

Quote

# 7 25-10-2002 , 08:23 PM

SM Alumni
Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 509

The Maya renderer is just fine, nothing wrong with it other than the fact that you have to set it up yourself. Once you learn it you can make some great images. But RAT and Mentalray are so much easier to use.

Maya was originally made for professional artists, so no "make pretty picture" button in it. But now with the price drop 3d hobbyists can now afford to use it so I guess A/W will continue to "dumb down" the product, but as far as I'm concerned, it's the best out there!

Darkon

Red bellows of flame have blackened my stones
Convulsing my frame and cracking my bones
Hell's dragons of steel who roar in their chains
Crawl into my caves to suck out my veins.....

-The Mountain P.F.M.

Quote

# 8 25-10-2002 , 08:25 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002

Location: CCS, Venezuela

Posts: 3,363

Originally posted by Kevin
try 3d max for a week, you will soon see why!

Originally Posted by

Straight to the point, excellent reply!

adldesigner
Caracas, Venezuela
Hell .. not gone perse, but with a certainly lower post count per day.

Quote

# 9 25-10-2002 , 11:57 PM

SM Alumni
Join Date: May 2002

Location: Exeter, UK

Posts: 407

Originally posted by kbrown

It's stable
It's flexible
It's loaded with features
It has everything you need...

Originally Posted by

Couldnt have said it better myself... only thing I'd add it that the interface is an absolute joy to use (especially in comparison to MAX).

Quote

# 10 26-10-2002 , 02:20 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: Oct 2002

Location: Murfreesboro, TN

Posts: 175

Im comin from using Animation:Master, and if any of you know A:M, you'll know exactly why I switched.. You would think the coders purposly screwed up the code just so it would crash every 5 seconds... Its also very limited.
To me, maya is great because:
1) Everyone uses it - cant be bad if it's one of the most popular out there.
2) Its only crashed on me I think3 thimes, but I was doing complex things...
3) You can do everything with it, except pay bills.

- Chris L. Harkins -

Quote

# 11 26-10-2002 , 02:31 AM

Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 69

To me, it just feels more polished. I dunno, I'm not some expert.

I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
-Bilbo Baggins

Quote

# 12 27-10-2002 , 02:29 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002

Posts: 441

Maya=Power.....nuff said user added image

Quote

# 13 27-10-2002 , 03:31 PM

Subscriber
Join Date: May 2002

Location: Faringdon, UK

Posts: 1,480

i wudnt say mayas the best program cos max can handle games better, houdini does particles better and is more open ended etc etc it just depends on what you want it to do

- Simon

My Website: www.Glass-Prison.com

Quote

# 14 27-10-2002 , 03:40 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002

Location: CCS, Venezuela

Posts: 3,363

Originally posted by Nem
max can handle games better,

Originally Posted by

Hmm ... this is just common thinking after the fact that Max has been used in a lot of games, but this is slowly changing.

is more open ended

Originally Posted by

Hmm ... I don´t see how Maya can be more open ended with the way the API works with MEL scripts.

it just depends on what you want it to do

Originally Posted by

Got that right, overall Maya´s got a good grasp out of every aspect so I would say Maya´s the best. Overall. Others can be better at particles, or modelling, or whatever, but they don´t combine their tools in a single package as powerfull as A|W´s one.
My 2 cents anyway ...

adldesigner
Caracas, Venezuela
Hell .. not gone perse, but with a certainly lower post count per day.

Last edited by adldesigner; 27-10-2002 at 04:47 PM.

Quote