SimplyMaya Forums

Welcome to the forum, feel free to ask questions here.

Home / forum / Lounges / Members Lounge / who said hardware rendering was fast?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

New Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-09-2003, 09:35 AM   #1
dragonfx
Registered User
 
dragonfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,257
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default who said hardware rendering was fast?

lol who said hardware render was fast?
same scene angle etc
hardware
Total Time For Render (hh:mm:ss): 00:02:37

software
Time For Tessellation (hh:mm:ss): 00:00:02
Time For Shadow Map (hh:mm:ss): 00:00:03
Time For Post Process (hh:mm:ss): 00:00:00
Time For Frame Render (hh:mm:ss): 00:00:26


Maybe i need one of those quadrofx3000?

(hey i got 30fps in wievports...dunno why it took 2 min to render 1frame)
dragonfx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2003, 01:58 PM   #2
roach105
Subscriber
 
roach105's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: T.O Baby!
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

do you want to post the file. Maybe we can all do render tests to see the results. I have a quadro FX 700 and a quadro FX 2000.
It should not take very long to do hardware renders, but it may depend on what your scene looks like.

Last edited by roach105 : 04-09-2003 at 08:02 PM.
roach105 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2003, 02:38 PM   #3
[icarus_uk]
Registered User
 
[icarus_uk]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Too near the sun
Posts: 501
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Isnt the quality you get out of hardware rendering so much worse than software?
__________________
[icarus_uk] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2003, 04:31 PM   #4
roach105
Subscriber
 
roach105's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: T.O Baby!
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

well, quality will depend on what you need. Hardware is still not at par with software rendering but it will eventually get there and will probably be the choice for most people.

you can currently get some very great renders from hardware.
I will post side by side renders of software and hardware.

hardware currently supports the following.

Polygons and NURBS geometry
Multiple textured channels
Advanced transparency
Hardware particles
Instancing
Point, Directional, Spot, and Ambient Light types
Any number of lights
Light linking
Per-vertex and per-pixel shading effects
Multi-pass and multi-sampling anti-aliasing
File textures for any supported channel
On-the-fly procedural and shading network conversions
Specular highlights
Bumps
Reflections
Shadows
Motion blur
RBG color, alpha matte (mask), and Z depth output
Command line rendering
Render diagnostics. Warnings for unsupported primitives, shaders, and light types and light features are provided.
roach105 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2003, 04:59 PM   #5
ragecgi
Super Moderator
 
ragecgi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 3,709
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Default

I's like to be part of this too!
__________________
Israel "Izzy" Long
Motion and Title Design for Broadcast-Film-DS
izzylong.com
ragecgi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2003, 08:20 PM   #6
roach105
Subscriber
 
roach105's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: T.O Baby!
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

hey guys, Here is to quick renders I did. Not much involved.

I will try this same render with bumps to see the speed hit. There may be a glitch on Quadro FX 700 that messes up bumos for some odd reason. will try the FX 2000.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	sw_hw01.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	131.8 KB
ID:	10357  
roach105 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2003, 08:46 PM   #7
ckyuk
Subscriber
 
ckyuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 1,334
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

I think it's because hardware rendering struggles on shadows and you've got quite a few try rendering without any shadow and see what times you get.

Edit
Forget that
I thought the image above was the one by dragonfx. woops

Last edited by ckyuk : 04-09-2003 at 08:48 PM.
ckyuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2003, 09:26 PM   #8
ragecgi
Super Moderator
 
ragecgi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 3,709
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Default

I'd try it with particles, but apart from some fluid sims, particles are divided anyway by renderer. (i.e. HW or SW)

So certain things can be only done in one or the other... sadly not both without instancing
__________________
Israel "Izzy" Long
Motion and Title Design for Broadcast-Film-DS
izzylong.com
ragecgi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2003, 09:57 PM   #9
dragonfx
Registered User
 
dragonfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,257
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by roach105
do you want to post the file. Maybe we can all do render tests to see the results. I have a quadro FX 700 and a quadro FX 2000.
It should not take very long to do hardware renders, but it may depend on what your scene looks like.
i cant post it as the file istn actually mine and righ now i dont have permission but it is game content meant... 50000aprox tri polys + colormaps + alpha no bumps
works fine on wievports... not if you hit maya hardware render... strange
dragonfx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2003, 11:43 PM   #10
roach105
Subscriber
 
roach105's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: T.O Baby!
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I also find the hardware tends to struggle when you start adding shadows and file textures.

Last edited by roach105 : 05-09-2003 at 12:13 AM.
roach105 is offline   Reply With Quote
New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

1 Month

$34

Month-to-month billing
$34/month
Unlimited access to all videos
Project files to download
Easy to cancel at anytime
 
 

3 months

$87

Billing every 3 months
$29/month
Unlimited access to all videos
Project files to download
Easy to cancel at anytime
Save $5 per month or $15 in total compared to monthly billing with this package.

12 months

$288

Billing every 12 months
$24/month
Unlimited access to all videos
Project files to download
Easy to cancel at anytime
Save $10 per month or $120 in total compared to monthly billing with this package.

Your plan will automatically renew. You can cancel at any time via your PayPal account to avoid being charged again.

You can view the FAQ on our video plans here. You can contact us directly here. By clicking one of the buttons above, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.