SimplyMaya Forums

Welcome to the forum, feel free to ask questions here.

Home / forum / Lounges / Maya Basics & Newbie Lounge / Smooth bind and skeleton hierarchy (Spider)
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

New Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-10-2003, 04:13 AM   #1
mrmitch
Subscriber
 
mrmitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Question Smooth bind and skeleton hierarchy (Spider)

I have a simple spider and skeleton for the 8 legs. I believe the existing joint hierarchy is correct. If I take any leg and create an IK Handle for it, it works fine. When I smooth bind the leg joint to the leg, it works fine. Moving the IK handle causes the leg to bend and deform peoperly. Here's the catch:
If I try and move the entire "Spider" group, any of the bound legs break apart from the body as I move the group. So, no animation until I figure it out. I've tried different hierarchies of legs and skeletons but to no avail.
Anybody have any ideas or can anyone look at the existing model?

Thanks in advance!
Attached Files
File Type: mb spider1.mb (142.5 KB, 26 views)
mrmitch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2003, 04:29 AM   #2
mtmckinley
The Maya Mountain
 
mtmckinley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,245
Thanks: 1
Thanked 25 Times in 25 Posts
Default

I assume you mean the legs stay at their position, as the body moves? That's normal IK behavior. To move the whole thing, you'd need to group all the IK handles and the root joint together.
__________________
-Mike
www.mtmckinley.net
The Maya Toolbelt
mtmckinley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2003, 02:15 AM   #3
mrmitch
Subscriber
 
mrmitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by mtmckinley
I assume you mean the legs stay at their position, as the body moves? That's normal IK behavior. To move the whole thing, you'd need to group all the IK handles and the root joint together.
No, as I move the spider forward(Z), the leg which has the IK detaches and moves forward (Z) ahead of the spider!
The skeleton stays rooted to the body properly.
mrmitch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2003, 04:33 AM   #4
mtmckinley
The Maya Mountain
 
mtmckinley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,245
Thanks: 1
Thanked 25 Times in 25 Posts
Default

Hmm, in that case, perhaps you need to turn the "sticky" option on in the IK handle attributes. That's a new "feature" of 5.0.
__________________
-Mike
www.mtmckinley.net
The Maya Toolbelt
mtmckinley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2003, 04:55 PM   #5
cujo
Registered User
 
cujo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 51
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Looked @ the File...
The Joint heirchy is NOT correct...
Theres almost too many problems to list.
Here's just a few.

1. There is no joints in the body, only 8 separate skeletons for the legs. they need to be connected with a root joint. So that you can select the root and move the entire skeleton.

2. For some reason you have the leg joints parented to the leg
surface. You can parent the surface to the joints (as in robots) or if the legs were more segmented.. but not the other way around.
( it looks like you tried to parent them the correct way but selected in the wrong order) select child first.

3. But if your gonna parent the surface to the joint, you dont bind it too. one or the other.

4. when finished you should be able to bind or parent the sufaces to a single skeleton. when you move the root of the skeleton the bound surfaces should follow along. you need to get to that point before you even think about ik's.

5. then you have everything grouped together.( 8 separate skeletons that are parented to 8 separate surfaces and the body ) when you move the group it looks fine. ( even though it's all wrong ) Its only when you add the iks or try to bind- your getting a double transformation.

I'd suggest looking at some rigging/binding tutorials first.
Keep with it. The best way to learn is by doing it over..
and over... and over...
Joe
__________________
rasterfarian
cujo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2003, 02:47 AM   #6
mrmitch
Subscriber
 
mrmitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by cujo
Looked @ the File...
The Joint heirchy is NOT correct...
Theres almost too many problems to list.
Here's just a few.

1. There is no joints in the body, only 8 separate skeletons for the legs. they need to be connected with a root joint. So that you can select the root and move the entire skeleton.

2. For some reason you have the leg joints parented to the leg
surface. You can parent the surface to the joints (as in robots) or if the legs were more segmented.. but not the other way around.
( it looks like you tried to parent them the correct way but selected in the wrong order) select child first.

3. But if your gonna parent the surface to the joint, you dont bind it too. one or the other.

4. when finished you should be able to bind or parent the sufaces to a single skeleton. when you move the root of the skeleton the bound surfaces should follow along. you need to get to that point before you even think about ik's.

5. then you have everything grouped together.( 8 separate skeletons that are parented to 8 separate surfaces and the body ) when you move the group it looks fine. ( even though it's all wrong ) Its only when you add the iks or try to bind- your getting a double transformation.

I'd suggest looking at some rigging/binding tutorials first.
Keep with it. The best way to learn is by doing it over..
and over... and over...
Joe
Thanks for your advice. I've tried sooooo many different things and I've looked at 3 or 4 books for different clues. I've spent most of my time just trying to learn basic modeling techniques and I haven't done many animations. I appreciate the time you spent to look at it and point out the flaws. It's sometimes more useful to have 10 minutes of expert guidance than spinning your wheels for hours!
mrmitch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2003, 08:18 PM   #7
Fra
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

what up
Fra is offline   Reply With Quote
New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

1 Month

$34

Month-to-month billing
$34/month
Unlimited access to all videos
Project files to download
Easy to cancel at anytime
 
 

3 months

$87

Billing every 3 months
$29/month
Unlimited access to all videos
Project files to download
Easy to cancel at anytime
Save $5 per month or $15 in total compared to monthly billing with this package.

12 months

$288

Billing every 12 months
$24/month
Unlimited access to all videos
Project files to download
Easy to cancel at anytime
Save $10 per month or $120 in total compared to monthly billing with this package.

Your plan will automatically renew. You can cancel at any time via your PayPal account to avoid being charged again.

You can view the FAQ on our video plans here. You can contact us directly here. By clicking one of the buttons above, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.