Digital humans the art of the digital double
Ever wanted to know how digital doubles are created in the movie industry? This course will give you an insight into how it's done.
# 1 03-10-2003 , 01:05 PM
slickrenderer's Avatar
Subscriber
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Zurich/London
Posts: 663

Who is bigger? Adobe or Apple

I guess apple ...right? or...


grrrr
# 2 03-10-2003 , 01:33 PM
David's Avatar
SM Tea Boy
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague
Posts: 3,228
Well Adobe's revenue is around $300 - $315 million a quarter.

Apple quartley revenue is around $1.54 billion, however in terms of profit Adobe makes more money i belive.

David user added image


From a readers' Q and A column in TV GUIDE: "If we get involved in a nuclear war, would the electromagnetic pulses from exploding bombs damage my videotapes?"
# 3 03-10-2003 , 02:39 PM
slickrenderer's Avatar
Subscriber
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Zurich/London
Posts: 663
WOW!!! Apple is way ahead on revenue atleast :-)


grrrr
# 4 03-10-2003 , 02:41 PM
Kurt's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Niagara Falls, Canada
Posts: 5,310
I am bigger, just no one knows about it....=)

Just hyper today....


I am enough of an artist to draw freely upon my imagination, knowledge is limited, imagination encircles the world. (Albert Einstein)

https://www.artstation.com/kurtb
# 5 04-10-2003 , 12:46 AM
Zyk0tiK's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 800
hehe apple is big, microsoft is huge, maya is mediocre... i mean, maya obviously makes a better product, but look at how many people use maya compared to how many people use macs... i'd say more macs are used. alot more macs... maya will last a long time, macs will last as long as untill they are useless, i know people using maya 3, because they still find it useful, but i know of noone using a mac that is only 300MHz...

# 6 04-10-2003 , 07:49 AM
slickrenderer's Avatar
Subscriber
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Zurich/London
Posts: 663
ummm I am using a 250mhz Mac ;-) For scanning and printing :-)
Works very well.


grrrr
# 7 04-10-2003 , 08:18 AM
adldesigner's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: CCS, Venezuela
Posts: 3,363

Originally posted by Zyk0tiK
hehe apple is big, microsoft is huge, maya is mediocre... i mean, maya obviously makes a better product, but look at how many people use maya compared to how many people use macs... i'd say more macs are used. alot more macs... maya will last a long time, macs will last as long as untill they are useless, i know people using maya 3, because they still find it useful, but i know of noone using a mac that is only 300MHz...

WTF? I thought it was an Adobe Vs Apple thing. :p

# 8 04-10-2003 , 08:54 AM
Chris_H's Avatar
Subscriber
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sheffield, uk
Posts: 246
Hey I use an old G3 300mhz and wacom ultrapd for my texturing and guess what, it still works great, does the jobuser added image
Of course I use a new pc for maya.
Now I'm off topic too, DOH!

# 9 04-10-2003 , 07:24 PM
Witchy's Avatar
Subscriber
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,254
A really big apple is nice but sometimes I prefer the smaller crunchier ones.

# 10 04-10-2003 , 08:29 PM
Zyk0tiK's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 800
lmfao so it is about Adobe or Apple user added image i dunno how the hell i ended up talking about Maya Vs Apple user added image!!!11

Posting Rules Forum Rules
You may not post new threads | You may not post replies | You may not post attachments | You may not edit your posts | BB code is On | Smilies are On | [IMG] code is On | HTML code is Off

Similar Threads