Substance Painter
In this start to finish texturing project within Substance Painter we cover all the techniques you need to texture the robot character.
# 16 17-09-2003 , 09:35 PM
Subscriber
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: minnesota, USA
Posts: 154
update on top.

kassun

Attached Thumbnails
# 17 17-09-2003 , 10:11 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 55
wow nice work! cool that you're going all out on the detailing. curious, but what do you intend to do with the model that makes use of this heavily detailed interior?


My Gallery of Previous Work
# 18 18-09-2003 , 11:52 PM
Subscriber
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: minnesota, USA
Posts: 154
thanks guys, JasonA: I am using this as my second model for my demo reel, so it is going to be a detailed as possible.

In the future I plan on using this model in a personal project. Well thaks for the positive feedback. Here is a small update. I finished one of the panels on the top and added the screen to the front gate.

??QUESTION?? Does anyone know why in some instances if you do a bolean both objects disappear? I have run into this problem a few times but have been able to step around it for now.

thanks,
Kassun

Attached Thumbnails
# 19 19-09-2003 , 03:19 PM
Subscriber
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: minnesota, USA
Posts: 154
a wider angle

Attached Images
# 20 24-09-2003 , 02:32 AM
Subscriber
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: minnesota, USA
Posts: 154
an update user added image

Attached Thumbnails
# 21 24-09-2003 , 06:03 PM
Subscriber
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: minnesota, USA
Posts: 154
finished the top, now working on the turret.

Kassun

Attached Thumbnails
# 22 24-09-2003 , 06:09 PM
Subscriber
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: minnesota, USA
Posts: 154
top angle

Attached Thumbnails
# 23 24-09-2003 , 06:26 PM
mtmckinley's Avatar
The Maya Mountain
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,245
cool stuff user added image

# 24 24-09-2003 , 06:48 PM
iron_tick's Avatar
Subscriber
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicagoland USA
Posts: 719
cool work, what are you lighting the scene with? Photons or Fake GI?


<html><font size=2>
<font color="blue">
And after calming me down with some orange slices and some fetal spooning,
E.T. revealed to me his singular purpose.

--TOOL, 10,000 Days---

</font></pre>
</html>
# 25 26-09-2003 , 07:33 PM
Subscriber
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: minnesota, USA
Posts: 154
finished the turret this afternoon. All that is left are the treads now.

iron_tick: i am using the gi-joe script for lighting.

Kassun

Attached Thumbnails
# 26 26-09-2003 , 07:35 PM
Subscriber
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: minnesota, USA
Posts: 154
another angle

kassun

Attached Thumbnails
# 27 26-09-2003 , 07:37 PM
Subscriber
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: minnesota, USA
Posts: 154
last angle,

kassun

Attached Thumbnails
# 28 27-09-2003 , 06:08 AM
Subscriber
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 123
The tank is great. There is only one crit i see, but if it's the look your lookin for then inore me. I think the main gun should be bigger and longer. Most tanks i see have bigger barrels. But great job. Lot of detail done to it. Can't wait to see it textured.

# 29 27-09-2003 , 03:00 PM
Witchy's Avatar
Subscriber
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,254
The Bradley is not a tank. It's an Infantry fighting vehicle, basically what the military call a 'battlefield taxi'. It's role is to carry troops safely, deposit them to secure ground and provide suppressing fire. In it's 'vanilla' role it carries its troops (6 men plus 3 crew) to a position, providing fire, the troops then disembark from the rear doors, run round and advance and it provides support fire for the assault. The British Army uses the Warrior IFV which is similarly intended. It does have other roles including scouting etc but that's it's main purpose. In development terms the use of this sort of IFV and tactic is fairly new in post ww2 terms - prior to that armoured infantry had less protection and less firepower at their disposal; the introduction of these vehicles gives infanteers the opportunity to integrate their ride into the battle.

As such the M2 does not need a tank gun; it packs the M242 25mm Bushmaster single barrel chain gun that fires either 200 or 500 rounds per minute as it's main arm. That's a lot of suppressing fire.

The model reflects that and looks pretty in scale to me. If it had a tank gun it would need a different turret and crew / passenger section (most of a turret is 'in' the tank on a tank) and the benefits of heavy suppressing fire would be lost - when supporting an infantry assault you want bags of fire laid down quickly and these armaments suit their job pretty well.

Really nice work btw.

# 30 27-09-2003 , 04:51 PM
gueedo's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Vienna, VA
Posts: 25
amazing model man...I was expecting a lot from it, and you exceeded the expectation.user added image

Posting Rules Forum Rules
You may not post new threads | You may not post replies | You may not post attachments | You may not edit your posts | BB code is On | Smilies are On | [IMG] code is On | HTML code is Off

Similar Threads