Maya for 3D Printing - Rapid Prototyping
In this course we're going to look at something a little different, creating technically accurate 3D printed parts.
# 1 03-06-2007 , 01:53 AM
wod's Avatar
Subscriber
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 115

64-Bit

just wondering if the is any benifits of using 64 bit versions of maya over 32 bit?

and i would imagine that the files are compatible between them??


"You won't get anything done by planning" - Karl Pilkington
# 2 03-06-2007 , 06:10 AM
Jr.Who
Guest
Posts: n/a
YouÕre using a 64 bit computer, right? user added image

# 3 03-06-2007 , 08:50 AM
wod's Avatar
Subscriber
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 115
i am yeah.
was just wondering if there was much of a difference between them


"You won't get anything done by planning" - Karl Pilkington
# 4 03-06-2007 , 08:54 AM
Jr.Who
Guest
Posts: n/a

Originally posted by wod
i am yeah.
was just wondering if there was much of a difference between them

The files should be compatible, yes. I think the advantages of having 64 bit Maya on a 64 computer would be:

1. Maya is all around faster
2. Maya consumes less RAM

Although, there probably are some other advantages (Just Google it and see what you find), but thatÕs all I could think of.
user added image

# 5 03-06-2007 , 09:00 AM
wod's Avatar
Subscriber
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 115
ok cool, thanks


"You won't get anything done by planning" - Karl Pilkington
# 6 03-06-2007 , 11:32 PM
gster123's Avatar
Moderator
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Manchester Uk
Posts: 6,300
I dont know how it would consume less RAM running on a 64 bit system, it would however be able to use more RAM (if its available of course) than the limit on a 32 bit version.


"No pressure, no diamonds" Thomas Carlyle
# 7 04-06-2007 , 12:45 AM
publicFunction's Avatar
Senior Software Developer
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Livingston, Scotland
Posts: 1,701
The only differnce between 64 and 32 bit is calculation times on the processor.

64bit is allegdly faster than 32bit. But I have yet to see proof. Dual or Quad Core is the way ahead for speed. I kinda think 64bit is falling on its arse tbh, there is very little support out there for it atm. Stick with 32bit and go dual core...


Chris (formerly R@nSiD)
Twitter
When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will truely know peace - Jimmy Hendrix
Winner SM VFX Challenge 1
3rd Place SM SteamPunk Challenge (May 2007)
# 8 04-06-2007 , 02:42 AM
wod's Avatar
Subscriber
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 115
yeh i have dual core already (AMD64 5000+ 2.6Ghz Dual core) and have a dual boot computer with windows vista 64 so i just thought i would try and utilise it as its there!


"You won't get anything done by planning" - Karl Pilkington
# 9 05-06-2007 , 06:28 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 891
R@nSiD > '64bit is allegdly faster than 32bit. But I have yet to see proof.'

64 bit is only faster for double precision fixed point instructions in programs that support it. For floating point, 64 bit CPUs don't perform any better just becuase they are 64 bit since x86 CPUs have 80 bit FPUs since the 1990s.


C. P. U. Its not a big processor... Its a series of pipes!
# 10 06-06-2007 , 12:13 AM
vladimirjp's Avatar
Subscriber
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: stuck in the 90's boston, USA
Posts: 1,871

Originally posted by R@nSiD
T

64bit is allegdly faster than 32bit. But I have yet to see proof.

ill laugh out loud at that comment.

:p

Posting Rules Forum Rules
You may not post new threads | You may not post replies | You may not post attachments | You may not edit your posts | BB code is On | Smilies are On | [IMG] code is On | HTML code is Off

Similar Threads