Zbrush Hair

Substance Painter

In this start to finish texturing project within Substance Painter we cover all the techniques you need to texture the robot character.

Watch

# 1 08-01-2012 , 10:20 PM

Lead Modeler - Framestore
Join Date: Feb 2003

Location: UK

Posts: 6,287

Im sure a few of you have seen this already but I figured I would post it up anyway.

https://www.cgchannel.com/2011/12/pix...em-for-zbrush/

Jay

Quote

# 2 08-01-2012 , 10:28 PM

The thin red line
Join Date: Aug 2009

Location: England

Posts: 4,472

I have to ask the stupid question can it be imported into maya.............dave

Avatar Challenge Winner 2010

Quote

# 3 08-01-2012 , 10:35 PM

Lead Modeler - Framestore
Join Date: Feb 2003

Location: UK

Posts: 6,287

read the post underneath the video

the stupid question is answered LOL

J

Quote

# 4 08-01-2012 , 10:47 PM

As Zbrushiac sounds stupid!
Join Date: Nov 2007

Location: Derby

Posts: 1,241

Wow, wish they had this when I was doing my Minotaur user added image

Looks like a ton of fun!

www.stevenegan-cgi.com

"Your weapons are no match for ours! People of Mars, surrender!"
"Um, this isn't Mars. This is Earth."
"Earth? Earth-with-nuclear-weapons Earth?"
"Yes."
[long pause] "Friend!!"

Quote

# 5 09-01-2012 , 03:09 AM

Lifetime Member
Join Date: Apr 2011

Posts: 258

Thanks Jay. Saw this one back in zbrushcentral. This is absolutely brilliant and it gives you control on the export. But I am not sure if these will be just pure polygons OR if you can convert it into guides and gives you more control in Maya. Never the less, this is awesome.

zbrush only missing thing is a dedicated render system and how you setup the materials.
I am not a big fan of the BPR to be honest.

https://cgi.ink
https://www.mduque.com

Quote

# 6 09-01-2012 , 05:22 AM

The Nurb Herd
Join Date: Oct 2007

Location: London

Posts: 2,381

haha, am i the only one who thinks this looks crap?
the example of the man made me chuckle.
the hair shader looks really over reflective, and it all looks a bit spray on.

Quote

# 7 09-01-2012 , 10:03 AM

Lead Modeler - Framestore
Join Date: Feb 2003

Location: UK

Posts: 6,287

hehe samples in my opinion are always crap. Its down to the individual artist at the end of the day

I think it is a poly output...good for stills (for now)

J

Quote

# 8 09-01-2012 , 10:12 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: Jul 2008

Location: Chelmsford, Essex, UK

Posts: 1,162

Ive only seen the one shot so far in pixolators announcement post on zbc and, I was with Dom.... A bit dubious and skeptical I think. But yeah....it won't be long before some of the beta testers or other community guys come along with some good uses I reckon.

Quote

# 9 09-01-2012 , 02:35 PM

EduSciVis-er
Join Date: Dec 2005

Location: Toronto

Posts: 3,374

I'm kinda with Dom... it didn't look too stunning yet, but I'm sure it will get better with time. I know the demos don't always give the best possible output of a tool, but they should be using the best possible scenario... and with something as technical and engine-driven as fur they should be producing close to the top with their demos.