This game is dayum scary!!!!! If you don't have a high-end system....
Get one!!! It is INCREDIBLE!!!! And scary as hell too!!!
-SuperDave71
Integrating 3D models with photography
Interested in integrating your 3D work with the real world? This might help
#
1
03-08-2004
, 06:53 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 147
DOOM 3 Graphics **WOW!!!!**
This game is dayum scary!!!!! If you don't have a high-end system....
Get one!!! It is INCREDIBLE!!!! And scary as hell too!!!
-SuperDave71
"Yeah I want my Cheezy Poofs!"
#
2
03-08-2004
, 07:30 PM
Guest
Posts: n/a
gameplay is pants - to dark - alien / preditor done it years ago but only better
#
3
03-08-2004
, 07:34 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 147
-Wow!!!-
SuperDave71
"Yeah I want my Cheezy Poofs!"
#
4
03-08-2004
, 08:20 PM
Subscriber
Join Date: Sep 2002
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 223
DOOOOOM!!!!
I finished the game last night, I have to say this one will definetly get an award.. as well it totally freaked the hell outta me.. the way they using lighting and sound effects.. every corner.. there's something jumpin out at you. Those are some sick people at ID, for coming together with this game again!
https://www.verticalincline.com
#
5
03-08-2004
, 08:24 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 147
I loved it!!!!
-SuperDave71
"Yeah I want my Cheezy Poofs!"
#
6
03-08-2004
, 08:30 PM
Subscriber
Join Date: Sep 2002
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 223
https://www.verticalincline.com
#
7
03-08-2004
, 08:47 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 147
-SuperDave71
"Yeah I want my Cheezy Poofs!"
#
8
09-08-2004
, 05:04 AM
Subscriber
Join Date: May 2003
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ventura California
Posts: 966
#
9
09-08-2004
, 11:05 AM
Subscriber
Join Date: Dec 2002
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sunderland, England
Posts: 581
Darkness is fine, just if the whole game is dark (I have played about 4-5 hours of it now) it seems a bit of a strange decision.
I know it's a remake of the original doom but the weapons seem very bland.
I think id should stick with multiplayer games and lease the engine t others who make far better single payer games.
cheers
Rich
#
10
11-08-2004
, 07:07 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 346
. doom 3 is great from a technical standpoint, but it has that plasticky sheen that has eternally plagued CG, whereas HL2 lacks it. i think it blows you away more right when you see it because that look is associated with prerendered imagery (perfect bump-mapping etc.) and is very technically impressive, but hl2 is implementing little things like skin-shading models and realistic specular highlights on the eyes. now if only it would come out... *grumble*
#
11
14-08-2004
, 02:46 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,257
Anyways, i must recognice that it actually suits windows and have left it as she did
the game in itself is smooth... and i enjoyed the original AvP game so
... the farcry engine looked to me like more technicaly advanced? im the only one?
#
12
14-08-2004
, 02:57 PM
The Maya Mountain
Join Date: Aug 2002
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,245
Far Cry seems to have much of the same visual technologies, but specializes in outdoor, long-range environments as opposed to the hallways of Doom.
#
13
14-08-2004
, 03:49 PM
Subscriber
Join Date: May 2003
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ventura California
Posts: 966
#
14
14-08-2004
, 03:49 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,257
Originally posted by mtmckinley
I've yet to play Doom3, but have seen it played some. I'm waiting to get a new computer in a couple months.
Far Cry seems to have much of the same visual technologies, but specializes in outdoor, long-range environments as opposed to the hallways of Doom.
yeah farcry also uses quadtrees for traversing/ocluding and theorically it can render all the indoors with lights and bumps+normals ie it can teorically do the same as doom3 on indoors (plus me believes it has a bigger 2.0shader variety)... it just doesnt looks as artistically snazzy(even with higher polycounts)...
the only thing i wonder about crytek is if it could handle the sheer size of the normal+bump+color+specular maps of doom3 at a decent speed... because they are huge even compressed! (i can feel them moving trough the agp when a new room/enemy not alrready loaded is about to appear... so who said there werent games that would ask for 512Mb of video memory to play at full quality(without 1/4 sec lags while loading)?
R-till: yes lets not forget the groupal ai, and the mp....
The only thing i didnt liked was the mouse sensivity controller... by default it was really f*ked up, i managed to set it so it was bearable, but actually never managed to make it enjoyable like it was from the beginning on ut2004 or sof2...
Last edited by dragonfx; 14-08-2004 at 08:21 PM.
#
15
14-08-2004
, 04:05 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 658
Posting Rules Forum Rules
Similar Threads
Doom 3 Challenge
by bullet1968 in forum Challenge Forum replies 14 on 21-02-2014
problems with graphics card
by Rhetoric Camel in forum Maya Basics & Newbie Lounge replies 19 on 17-09-2007
DOOM 3
by adldesigner in forum Maya Basics & Newbie Lounge replies 13 on 09-11-2002
Graphics card prices for you guys...
by Cyberlloyd in forum Maya Basics & Newbie Lounge replies 3 on 21-09-2002
Topics
Free Courses
Full Courses
VFX News
How computer animation was used 30 years ago to make a Roger Rabbit short
On 2022-07-18 14:30:13
Sneak peek at Houdini 19.5
On 2022-07-18 14:17:59
VFX Breakdown The Man Who Fell To Earth
On 2022-07-15 13:14:36
Resident Evil - Teaser Trailer
On 2022-05-13 13:52:25
New cloud modeling nodes for Bifrost
On 2022-05-02 20:24:13
MPC Showreel 2022
On 2022-04-13 16:02:13